

Both figures come from the same respondents, answering the same questionnaire.
That is not a contradiction. It is the condition the UK research industry operates within. And it is where this pull-out begins.
What's inside?
The UK Pull-Out covers five findings drawn from the Research Effectiveness Review 2026 - on confidence and doubt, AI adoption, trust in respondents, the methods practitioners would fight hardest to keep, and why rising investment isn't translating into activation.
The five findings include:
- 94% of the UK audience rate research as at least somewhat effective. 85% have personally found it to be wrong. Both numbers come from the same people.
- 38% of the UK audience call AI a game-changer. 26% say their biggest concern is that AI will make research more superficial and less human. Most hold both positions simultaneously.
- 94% of UK organisations are using AI in their research process. 79% say it has improved insight quality. But 12% say it has improved speed only not the quality of what is learned. Adoption is not effectiveness.
- The UK audience believes on average that 67% of claimed survey behaviour actually reflects reality. Only 32% routinely validate claimed behaviour against observed data. The remaining two thirds validate only when critical, rarely, or never.
- 73% of UK research organisations increased their budget over the past two years. Yet 56% of agency relationships are transactional, 68% of tracker owners expect their setup to change within two years, and only 33% actively use their customer segmentation.
Download the UK Pull-Out of the Research Effectiveness Review 2026 below.
To read the full Research Effectiveness Review 2026, click HERE